Should dopers be in Baseball Hall of Fame?

Fans of baseball and many other individuals seem to be indignant by results of voting for the Hall of Fame. Some brilliant players have not entered the Baseball Hall of Fame. It is not surprisingly that you also ask why they have not been supported. Under rules of voting, those that have manifested amazing baseball skills and contributed to their teams obviously should be elected. It goes without saying that such baseball players, as Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire and certain other individuals have displayed splendid skills and achievements while playing professionally. Why aren’t they in the Baseball Hall of Fame?
Numerous voters say that they will never support those that have ever been related to anabolic steroids and/or other related products. Dopers must be punished. Future generations should realize that they will never really succeed, if they apply doping products.
What would you do, if you were a voter? Would you support consumers of steroids?
Actually, voters never possess entire information about admitted and suspected consumers of steroids. You can’t prove that Roger Clemens has really taken doping products. Many persons have suspicions but there is no any steroid evidence. How may voters refuse to support him? Are they sure that he has taken anabolic steroids and other prohibited preparations? –No, they aren’t. That’s why it is unfair to keep Roger Clemens out of the Baseball Hall of Fame just because of suspicions.
While certain voters are ready to support suspected steroid users, they state that they will never vote for an admitted doper. However it seems to be right, let review the situation better! Have steroids played any great role in success of certain baseball player? For example, if even Roger Clemens has administered performance-enhancing drugs, it is possible to convince anyone that he has had great success not because of steroids. Great accomplishment of this famous baseball player have been displayed before his alleged steroid use. According to several statements, Roger Clemens has taken steroids since 1998 and then in 2000 and 2001.  But the most amazing achievements have been done by him before 1998. So, nobody can affirm that anabolic steroids have helped Roger Clemens to succeed in professional baseball. That’s why he should be in the Hall of Fame.
Furthermore, why are numerous persons inclined to blame only steroid users? Isn’t it the society that presses sportspersons to start using anabolic steroids and other related products?